Back to articles
    Market News

    Toronto's June Building Permits Jumped 73% — Statistics Canada Credits a Hospital, Not Housing

    Frank Lee·Market Analyst & Industry Columnist·August 29, 2026·8 min read
    Toronto's June Building Permits Jumped 73% — Statistics Canada Credits a Hospital, Not Housing

    National building permits rebounded 18.5% in June and the Toronto CMA jumped 73.3%. Strip out the institutional surge — StatCan says newly approved medical-institution permits in Toronto — and Ontario residential permits actually fell 6.1%. CMHC's July starts then confirmed Toronto housing starts were down 10%.

    Statistics Canada's June building-permit numbers, released August 12, look like a construction boom. They are not. National permit values rebounded $2.3 billion, or 18.5%, to $14.9 billion. The Toronto census metropolitan area jumped 73.3% month-over-month to $4,013.0 million. Ontario as a whole rose 28.5% to $6.2 billion.

    Read past the headline and the housing pipeline is going the other way. Ontario's residential permits fell 6.1% in the same month. Statistics Canada attributes the provincial surge to the institutional component — bolstered by Ontario (+$1.3 billion) and concentrated in the Toronto CMA, where newly approved permits for a medical institution landed in June.

    A hospital is not a housing start. For GTA buyers, sellers and agents heading into the fall market, that distinction is the entire story.

    What June actually says

    The national rebound more than offset two prior monthly declines — April was down $536.7 million, May down $383.3 million. Non-residential construction intentions did most of the work, rising $1.8 billion to $6.8 billion. Residential permits rose a smaller $479.7 million, or 6.3%, to $8.1 billion.

    Inside non-residential, the institutional component nearly doubled, up $1.5 billion to $3.2 billion. Industrial permits contributed +$268.8 million to $1.2 billion; commercial, +$67.9 million to $2.4 billion. On a constant-dollar basis (2023=100), the national total was up 18.0% month-over-month and 18.6% year-over-year.

    Ontario's Table 2 split is the number that should be on every GTA listing presentation this month:

    • Ontario total: $6,230.6 million — up 28.5% from May, up 33.1% from June 2025
    • Ontario non-residential: $3,669.0 million — up 73.0% month-over-month, up 60.5% year-over-year
    • Ontario residential: $2,561.6 million — down 6.1% from May's $2,728.3 million, up only 6.8% year-over-year

    Our calculation from those figures: residential was 41.1% of Ontario's June permit total. Non-residential was 58.9%. A year earlier, residential was still the larger of the two ($2,397.4 million vs. $2,285.5 million). The mix flipped, and it flipped because of one institutional surge, not because homebuilders returned.

    Toronto's 73% jump is real. It is also not homes.

    The Toronto CMA's seasonally adjusted permit value went from $2,315.4 million in May to $4,013.0 million in June — a 73.3% monthly increase and 84.3% above June 2025's $2,177.8 million. In dollars, that is a $1,697.6 million month-over-month increase (our calculation). Toronto alone accounted for 27.0% of every building-permit dollar issued in Canada in June.

    Statistics Canada is explicit about why: the institutional gain was “concentrated in the Toronto census metropolitan area (CMA), where there were newly approved building permits for a medical institution.” The agency does not publish a residential/non-residential split for the CMA in this release, so we will not invent one. What we can say from the provincial table is that Ontario residential permits fell while Ontario non-residential permits jumped 73.0% — and StatCan names Toronto's medical-institution approvals as the concentration point of that institutional wave.

    Nationally, 26,106 dwelling units were authorized in June, up 8.4% from May and 6.5% from a year earlier. Multiple dwellings (21,924) did more of that unit work than singles (4,182). Those are Canada-wide unit counts. They do not reverse Ontario's residential-value decline.

    The rest of the GTA did not get a rebound

    Table 3 reports total permit values by CMA — housing and non-residential combined — so these are not housing-only figures. They still show how uneven June was around Toronto:

    • Hamilton: $256.9 million, up 39.9% month-over-month and 27.6% year-over-year
    • Kitchener–Cambridge–Waterloo: $171.8 million, up 15.1% from May but still down 36.0% from June 2025
    • Oshawa: $38.3 million, down 59.2% month-over-month and 82.0% year-over-year
    • St. Catharines–Niagara: $87.8 million, down 23.0% from May and 70.1% from a year earlier
    • Barrie: $42.7 million, down 42.2% month-over-month and 26.1% year-over-year
    • Guelph: $24.6 million, down 61.8% from May
    • London: $183.1 million, down 30.3% month-over-month and 45.7% year-over-year
    • Ottawa (Ontario part): $358.4 million, down 12.5% from May, up 25.0% year-over-year

    Oshawa authorizing 82% less permit value than a year ago is not a rounding error. Durham is the same belt where TRREB's July resale data showed the tightest months-of-inventory readings in the GTA. A resale market that is tightening on scarce listings, sitting next to a CMA whose permit book has collapsed, is a supply story — just not the one the national 18.5% headline implies.

    The second-quarter trend is the more useful number

    Monthly permit values swing on a handful of large projects. Statistics Canada therefore publishes a quarterly read, and it is less flattering for housing.

    In the second quarter of 2026, total permit values rose $1.4 billion to $40.4 billion, up 3.7% from the previous quarter. Non-residential rose $1.9 billion to $15.4 billion — the largest quarterly increase in the series — “driven by Ontario, largely due to its institutional component (+$1.6 billion).” Ontario pushed the national institutional component to a quarterly record high of $6.1 billion, with hospital construction intentions in the Toronto CMA supporting the increase.

    The residential sector went the other way. Q2 residential permits fell $944.2 million, or 4.3%, to $21.1 billion. The multi-unit component accounted for most of that drop, down $873.7 million to $13.8 billion. Losses were led by Ontario (−$582.4 million) and British Columbia (−$386.2 million). Alberta (+$180.1 million) only moderated the decline.

    Nationwide, 80,000 single-family and multi-family units were authorized in the second quarter (not seasonally adjusted), down from 82,200 in the same period a year earlier.

    Put plainly: Ontario's housing-intentions pipeline contracted through the spring. June's headline rebound did not reverse that. It papered over it with a hospital.

    Six days later, CMHC's July starts confirmed the housing pipeline is still thinning

    Building permits are intentions. Housing starts are shovels. CMHC's July 2026 starts release, published August 18, is the next data point in the same chain, and it does not show Toronto builders catching up.

    • Toronto CMA actual starts: 1,540 units in July 2026, down 10% from 1,720 in July 2025. Multi-unit starts fell 14% (1,262 vs. 1,461); single-detached actually rose 7% (278 vs. 259).
    • Ontario actual starts in centres of 10,000+: 4,641 in July 2026, down 26% from 6,296 in July 2025.
    • National SAAR of housing starts: 229,074 units in July, down 5% from 240,773 in June. The six-month trend was closer to flat, down 0.5% to 247,377 units.
    • Toronto six-month SAAR trend: 25,118 units, down 6% from 26,855 in June.
    • Ontario six-month SAAR trend: 63,404 units, down 4% from 65,760.

    Toronto still has a large pipeline already in the ground: 92,749 units under construction in July, up 0.6% from 92,217 in June, with 17,878 approved units awaiting start (up 5.2%). Completions in the Toronto CMA fell to 1,009 units, down 24.1% from June. Deputy chief economist Tania Bourassa-Ochoa said starts are “continuing to moderate” and that “fewer new projects are being started in many markets, notably in Vancouver, Calgary and Toronto.”

    Permits in June spiked because a medical institution was approved. Starts in July fell because multi-unit housing did not follow. Those two sentences are consistent with each other. They are not consistent with a housing-supply recovery.

    What this means if you're transacting this fall

    If you're buying: do not read a 73% Toronto permit jump as more condos and townhouses arriving in 2027–28. The StatCan release names a medical institution as the concentration of the institutional surge; Ontario residential permits fell 6.1% in the same month; CMHC then recorded a 10% year-over-year drop in Toronto starts. Near-term resale tightness — sellers pulling listings — is still the more relevant constraint on what you will pay this fall. The completions still coming from the existing 92,749-unit Toronto under-construction book will keep adding stock, particularly in the condo segment, even as new housing intentions fade.

    If you're selling: a hospital permit does not compete with your listing. A thinning multi-unit start rate does, eventually, reduce the flow of competing new inventory — but that shows up in 2027 and 2028, not at your September showing. Price against today's resale comparables, not against a national permit headline.

    If you're an agent: the useful chart in this release is Ontario residential vs. non-residential, not the Canada total. Clients who heard “building permits jumped 18.5%” heard a non-residential story. The housing-intentions story is Ontario multi-unit down $582.4 million in Q2 and Toronto starts down 10% in July. Those are the figures that belong in a CMA-level market update.

    Sources

    Compiled by the Real Estate HQ editorial desk from primary data releases (sources linked above) and reviewed for accuracy. Figures are as reported on the release date. Calculations identified as ours are derived from the Statistics Canada tables cited. Table 3 CMA values are total building permits (residential and non-residential combined); we do not treat them as housing-only.

    Share this article
    Frank Lee

    Written by

    Frank Lee

    Market Analyst & Industry Columnist

    Former bank credit analyst turned realtor. 15+ years of data-driven commentary on TRREB statistics, Ontario housing policy, and the macro forces shaping the GTA market.

    View all articles by Frank →

    We use cookies to enhance your experience, serve personalized ads, and analyze traffic. By continuing to browse, you consent to our use of cookies. Privacy Policy